Feeds:
Posts
Comments

completed by people

just enough design, at the Promenade Plantée, Paris

Rowan Moore, here:

I’m told, by people who don’t suffer from the radical unmusicality which is my personal affliction, that in music pauses are as important as the notes. Something similar is true of architecture. The bits that are not there matter as much as those that are, as if buildings are only completed by the people and actions they contain. You sometimes want the architecture to hold back. What makes bad design offensive is often the urge to fill every space with the decisions of the architect, to determine, finish and close down a place before it is inhabited.

Renaissance view

Don’t you love that new header? Toby took the photo at the Crane Reservation in Ipswich, a property of The Trustees of Reservations. He said that for him it has the quality of an oil painting; I agree completely. It has that same dark/light/dark sequence, that same frame/focal point/background flavor as a painting by an Italian Renaissance painter.

At the Crane Reservation, Toby writes, “It looks like The Trustees have deliberately maintained the opening to the view, and that the late-afternoon light, raking across the marshes and the bark of the trees, is what makes it work. I like the light on the ground-layer plants.”

The whole ravishing photo.

Here’s an example of landscape management supporting a design intention. Sometimes we design places with stone, wood, earth, metal, and plants; sometimes we design views, and tweak a visitor’s perception of a place by what we leave in, what we remove, and how we frame and focus what they see. Obviously, a photograph can be manipulated to do these things, but sometimes a photograph simply records a perception that has been shaped by others, as The Trustees have apparently shaped the Crane Reservation view.

A view framed by dark elements, a view into a light space, a view toward water, a view toward curves — what a pleasing combination. I want to take a bite out of this photo.

The massive four-stem Norway maple that blew down in high winds last week.

Following up on the list post item from June 9, about what to use to replace a lost Norway maple: it will be a honey locust (Gleditsia triacanthos inermis ‘Shademaster’), placed slightly upslope from the Norway stump.

Last week I visited the North Shore seaside site (where last year we revamped the drive court planting and added bamboo and holly for property line screening; to read about those projects, see Refinement and Air Spade In Action) and saw the spatial effect of losing this tree.

Surprisingly, the loss wasn’t as bad as I had thought it would be. The tree’s canopy had taken up a huge amount of space and cast deep shade over quite an area. It had screened my clients from an unappealing view of the corner of their neighbor’s house — but also from a wider view of the Boston skyline in the distance. Now the horizon is wider; they’re going to have a spectacular view of the city’s July 4 fireworks. While the neighbor’s house is unfortunately visible for the moment, the honey locust will mitigate that view. A younger specimen maple just over the property line, which had been hidden by the larger tree, looks healthy, and helps provide a perspective-focusing foreground to the far horizon.

Fortunately too, while the tree provided shade over a wide area of the site, much of its underplanting consisted of junipers and taxus, which should benefit from having more sunlight. The redtwig dogwood, azaleas, and hydrangea will think a bit about how much they like being exposed, but I think they’ll adapt. Even the little spring shade garden should fare all right, protected as much of it by a dense shrub planting from full sun exposure. Many of the herbaceous plants in it are ephemeral anyway, showing up in early spring before any trees leaf out, and fading back as foliage emerges above them.

Shade cast by the now-gone Norway maple protected the little spring garden and its ligularia circle at the path's end.

Our biggest concern for this newly sunny area is the ligularia bed. This bed, banded with a circle of bluestone, makes the southern terminus of a sightline through the tiny spring garden. The ‘Britt Marie Crawford’ ligularia, with its chocolate-brown foliage and golden spikes of flowers, makes a ravishing dot at the bottom of the exclamation point. And it’s a shade lover.

Ligularia 'Britt Marie Crawford' in its circle bed.

It may not be at all happy to be getting sun all day every day. My hope is that it can handle it well enough for long enough to feel relief from the kinder, more dappled shade that the new honey locust will eventually cast.

This site has seen several mature trees come down since last year; neighbors next to the drive court removed a large maple and a lovely S-shaped pine, an ailing ash tree got taken out, and a graceful Russian olive specimen, some 20 feet tall, blew down in the same storm that took the big Norway maple.

Each subtraction has shifted the sun/shade proportions, and each will affect the growth and health of the surrounding area. This kind of change requires adaptation both by the plants and by the owners, and provides opportunities for new ways of seeing a familiar place.

Voice.  That’s it.  My phone lets me talk, and listen to someone on the other end; if I’m working, I can plug a headset in or hit the speaker phone button.  And use the ‘Mute’ button if necessary.
I opened Toby’s iPhone app post with reservations, having felt saturated recently with iPhone app ‘articles’ that seem little more than ways for a newspaper or blog to fill space.   (In the Boston Sunday Globe Magazine recently I mistook a piece on phone apps for an advertisement, because it was largely a collection of photos of phones, each one showing a different app, with a weblink below.  It was not poor beleaguered print journalism’s finest hour.)
I’ve been a dedicated voice-only phone user forever.  Low-to-the-ground technology is what I like to use, knowing how easy it is for me to get lured in to a moving display and find myself sidetracked for an hour or four.  And I just got a new phone contract last week, turning down the chance to get a new phone because the one I have works just fine.  So a post about phone apps?  Argh.
But the apps Toby shows are making my dialing finger (so to speak) itch.  It would be hugely helpful to be able to place dimensions directly on a photo in the field.  My field notes tend to be scratchy and blobby, and while I’ve developed a method for keeping straight what numbers go with what dimension line, that dimensioning app holds out the promise of more organized field dimensioning.  So tempting.  And stitching together a bunch of photos a la David Hockney would simplify my reference photo printing, too.  Even the number converter looks inviting, though I keep a handy cheat sheet with me for quick and dirty conversions.

An excerpt from a recent set of field notes.

Still, colored pencil and paper are quick, and while they’re not beautiful they do give me the information I need, in exactly the way they’ll be useful when it’s time to draw a base plan and work out the details.  You can’t beat the price.  So far, the end results  over the last couple of decades have been successful.

Stay tuned.  I’m betting that I’ll stick with a voice-only phone, but if the iPad adds a camera and a UWB port and can use those apps I may turn into a technology maven yet.

landscape and crime

Last week, Deb and I discussed “the New York Times‘s increasingly goofy treatment of landscape and horticulture, including their astonishing discovery of the tree lawn, aka the “parkway” (Illinois) or “verge” (Britain).”

This week, it’s The Wall Street Journal that’s on the verge.  In an article on the Dictionary of American Regional English, they write:

It’s surprising how many different names Americans have for that strip of ground between the sidewalk and the street: “boulevard,” “grass plot,” “parkway” and “tree bank” are among them. So after a child abductor in the ’90s left a note demanding that ransom be deposited in a trash can “on the devil strip” at an intersection, a forensic linguist used the dictionary to help solve the crime—because the term was common only in a small part of Ohio.

See? Landscape literacy saves lives.

I’m still getting used to the idea of my phone as a serious tool, but I find I’m using it more and more. Here are some apps I’ve come to rely on:

.

I was taking site measurements with Susan Opton when she showed me My Measures and Dimensions. My Measures doesn’t actually take the measurements itself (not yet anyhow), but it provides an information-rich way to capture them. Instead of recording measurements on paper, I can place the measurements directly on a photo. When I get back to my office, I have the measurements and a good record of what I’ve measured.

.

My Measures allows me to place dimension lines precisely, change their color (to contrast with varying backgrounds), give them different end markings (depending on the type of measurement), and supplement them with notes. It doesn’t yet provide a way to make sure the dimensions are right-side-up. Maybe in the next version.

.

When I need to convert vertical measurements taken in feet and inches into decimal elevations, I use Convertbot.

Convertbot is elegant and friendly.  Aside from lengths and distances, Convertbot handles weights, speeds, temperatures, volumes, areas, currencies, data sizes, and time.

..

Another surprisingly capable app is AutoStitch Panorama. There are lots of iPhone and desktop apps that automatically assemble photos into a seamless panorama, but most are restricted to linear panoramas based on a single row of photos, and don’t provide a way to include images that are higher or lower than that row. AutoStitch can stitch in more than one direction, converting arrays of photos into mosaics that are both broad and high.

AutoStitch can leave the edges ragged, as above, or it can crop them smooth, below.

In the list-making spirit of the moment, I’ve added four web sites to our “Sites We Like” blogroll, which lives on the right side of this page (scroll down).  Below, I’ve linked below to some samples of what each of them does best:

.

Places was a one of the great design magazines. Without glitz or color photos, it quietly brought together the environmental design disciplines without worrying too much about which was which.  Now it’s online, in the even more fertile and diverse setting of Design Observer. Here are some ways to think about WalMart. (It isn’t about the box.)

.

The Aesthetics of Joy doesn’t pay too much attention to disciplinary boundaries, either, and it’s a powerful antidote to self-seriousness. Here, it touches down on landscape.

.

The Microbe Factor and <br />Its Role in Our Climate FutureUnder Pressure to Block Oil,<br /> A Rush To Dubious ProjectsThe Anthropocene Debate: <br /> Marking Humanity’s Impact Toward Sustainable Travel:<br /> Breaking the Flying Addiction

Environment360 is a soberer place, “Opinion, Reporting, and Debate” from the Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies. Good, solid, reader-friendly science.  Here is the Anthropocene.

.

And Bobulate is the non-designer friend that every designer should have, the one who asks seemingly naive questions that prompt you to rethink everything. Here, time, books, and movement.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.